Table of contents:

• Finer granularity and/or lower overhead SIGL for z/OS external functions?
• Mixed case (8 messages)
• Okay to use IRXEXCOM asynchronously? (2 messages)
• probe - test

1. Finer granularity and/or lower overhead SIGL for z/OS external functions?
   • Finer granularity and/or lower overhead SIGL for z/OS external functions? (62 lines)
     From: Charles Mills <charlesm@MCN.ORG>

2. Mixed case
   • Mixed case (72 lines)
     From: Miller, Bill <B.MILLER2@GWCCNET.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (92 lines)
     From: Charles Mills <charlesm@MCN.ORG>
   • Re: Mixed case (128 lines)
     From: Miller, Bill <B.MILLER2@GWCCNET.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (139 lines)
     From: Suresh Murugesan <sureshk.murugesan1@FIRSTDATA.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (176 lines)
     From: Johnson, Daryl <Daryl.Johnson@PACIFICORP.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (198 lines)
     From: Miller, Bill <B.MILLER2@GWCCNET.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (240 lines)
     From: Johnson, Daryl <Daryl.Johnson@PACIFICORP.COM>
   • Re: Mixed case (286 lines)
     From: Miller, Bill <B.MILLER2@GWCCNET.COM>

3. Okay to use IRXEXCOM asynchronously?
   • Okay to use IRXEXCOM asynchronously? (91 lines)
     From: Charles Mills <charlesm@MCN.ORG>
   • Re: Okay to use IRXEXCOM asynchronously? (89 lines)
     From: Rick McGuire <object.rexx@GMAIL.COM>

4. probe - test
   • probe - test (17 lines)
     From: cics <cics@NIOI.GOV.IL>