LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2000, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:51:49 -0500
Reply-To:   Paige Miller <paige.miller@KODAK.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Paige Miller <paige.miller@KODAK.COM>
Organization:   Eastman Kodak Company
Subject:   Re: an interesting game
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

"William W. Viergever" wrote: > > Where are all the Bayesian's when you need them, eh? > > (If I recall this one - stay with your original choice).

Sorry, the correct answer is that it is to your advantage to switch. The math is very easy, no need for a simulation or SAS or to invoke Bayesian statistics.

> At 05:17 PM 01/23/2000 +0000, shiling@MATH.WAYNE.EDU wrote: > >You have three doors to choose from, a la Let's Make a Deal. Behind one > >of them is the grand prize. You choose one door. That leaves two that > >you didn't choose. I now open one of the doors you didn't choose and > >show you that the prize is not there. That leaves two possibilities: > >it's either behind the door you chose, or behind the one remaining door > >that you did not choose. > > > >I now give you the chance to switch doors after I've shown you the empty > >one. Is it to your advantage to switch, or does it make no difference? > >*************************** > > > >If you are not sure what is the correct answer, you can do a simulation > >in a data step.

-- Paige Miller Eastman Kodak Company "It's nothing until I call it!" -- Bill Klem, NL Umpire

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page