LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:59:22 -0600
Reply-To:     "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Subject:      Re: differences between ordinal regression vs. catreg

The CATREG procedure performs a linear regression of a categorical dependent variable on a set of categorical predictor variables, using optimally scaled transformations of the variables if so desired. It's a special case of the OVERALS algorithm. The PLUM procedure fits one of a series of nonlinear cumulatiave response models for an ordinal response variable with categorical and/or continuous predictors. In CATREG, all variables must be numeric with positive integer values (or else the values get truncated). In PLUM, the predictors can take on any values.

David Nichols Principal Support Statistician and Manager of Statistical Support SPSS Inc.

> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans de Wit [mailto:hw@scp.nl] > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 4:02 AM > To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: [SPSSX-L] differences between ordinal regression vs. catreg > > > Could somebody tell me about the differences between the > ordinal regression and > the regression using optimal scaling in Spss 10? > > The only thing i could think of is that Ordinal regression > can take interval covariates > and Catreg not really. > > Are there differences in the interpretation of the results? > > Hans de Wit > > h.de.wit@scp.nl >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page