LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:08:31 -0300
Reply-To:     hmaletta@overnet.com.ar
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Hector E. Maletta" <hmaletta@OVERNET.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: multiple regression
Comments: To: Hector Musacchio <hmm@UNL.EDU.AR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hector Musacchio wrote: > When I calculate bivariate correlations, the variables A and B > are correlated with an r=0.44 (positive). In the multivariate > regression, adding another 3 or 4 variables (and method enter), > results that A is an independent predictor of B, but with a > NEGATIVE beta !! > Is this possible? Thanks in advance.

Of course it's possible. The positive bivariate correlation is totally explained by the other variables in the second equation. Controlling for those other variables, as you did with your multiple regression equation, the relation between B and A has a negative sign. Once I found a similar situation in a study of Latin American women. It was approximately as follows. The dependent variable was fertility (number of children), the independent variables were education attained by women, household income, and labor force participation (whether or not the woman was employed or seeking work). Lower income, lower education and no employment all were positively related to fertility (bivariate correlations were all negative). Controlling for education and employment, the net effect of income was surprisingly positive, meaning that for women with the same education and labor participation values, the number of children increased as income grew higher. In particular, for women with no college education that did not work outside their home, higher income meant more children. The overall negative bivariate correlation of income and children was completely explained by education and labor market participation. Many similar situations appear in texts such as Hubert Blalock's Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. In short, the sign of a correlation can be changed, or the correlation reduced to zero, by introducing control variables.

Hector Maletta Universidad del Salvador Buenos Aires, Argentina


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page