LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:14:01 -0500
Reply-To:     Stephen Salbod <ssalbod@FSMAIL.PACE.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Stephen Salbod <ssalbod@FSMAIL.PACE.EDU>
Subject:      McNemar and Cochran Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

I analyze two related binary variables (N =54) using the nonparametric procedures: McNemar and Cochran Q (k=2). The obtained p values were .227 and .132 for the McNemar and Cochran Q , respectively. I was wondering whether this is because the McNemar is an Exact Sig. while the Cochran Q is Asymp. Any explanation about this difference will be appreciated.

TIA, Steve

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page