LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:03:01 -0600
Reply-To:     Ian.Straus@VIAINFO.NET
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Ian Straus <Ian.Straus@VIAINFO.NET>
Subject:      Re: Negative Coefficients
Comments: To: dobson_shail@HOTMAIL.COM
Content-Type: text/plain

Is this variable with the unexpected negative coefficient, highly correlated with another independent variable with a positive coefficient?

Ian Straus

> -----Original Message----- > From: Shail Dobson [SMTP:dobson_shail@HOTMAIL.COM] > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 9:12 AM > To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Negative Coefficients > > Hello group, > > I did a stepwise regression, 1 dependent variable with 7 independent > variables. The sample size is 100. It is a rating scale, where 10 > means > excellent and 1 means poor. > > One of an important variable shows a positive significant correlation > with > the dependent variables, but in the coefficient matrix this has a > negative > coefficient. It seems funny to me that there would be an inverse > relationship in the Beta or t-coefficients. Could some shed some light > why > it is happing? I generally conclude my key drivers based on their beta > values. > > Many thanks, > Shail > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page