LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2000, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:47:06 -0500
Reply-To:     Mark.K.Moran@CCMAIL.CENSUS.GOV
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Mark Moran <Mark.K.Moran@CCMAIL.CENSUS.GOV>
Subject:      Recognition Challenges from Two Piles
Comments: To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.VT.EDU
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This is an extra credit optional classroom exercise, which I am trying to develop for a class I will eventually teach involving quality assurance.

We have 2 nonoverlapping piles of manufactured objects. The piles can be called Pile ACCEPT and Pile REJECT. These piles were artificially arranged in place one by one where they now are, not so much accumulated necessarily in a "natural" way ... and, again, the piles have no overlap. Every object belongs in one pile or the other and can be described by its x, y location along with other variables z_1, z_2, . . . , z_i.

As part of the validation/recognition challenge for a quality inspection program, objects are drawn from the two piles at random (with replacement, I think) and then logged into a database that stores x, y, z_1, z_2, . . . , z_i. The variables z_1, z_2, . . . , z_i for the object (which are the only measures readily identified in the manufacturing process) are presented to an inspector without the x, y position info. (Had the inspector known the x,y positions, his or her job would become much easier at this point because of the non-overlap.) After many trials with different objects sampled for the inspector to label on the basis of the z_1, z_2, . . . , z_i variables, the question to be analysed is simply whether the inspector's method of attaching REJECT/ACCEPT labels based on z_vars surpasses, exactly equals, or bombs worse than someone randomly guessing which was which. Ideally a p-value and standard deviation would go with this proficiency estimate.

If each of the two piles can be set for specific bivariate distributions [Bivariate N(sigma,mu), chi square, etc.] with unique bivariate parameters for each pile, and the locations of the two piles separated by specific two-dimensional distances apart,* is there a logical way to simulate and answer this question in SAS 6.12? A more advanced version of the SAS would accommodate not only different distributions and spacings apart of the piles, but also different values of i (e.g., if there are 5 z vars then z_i = z_5) and sampling with or without replacement.

How much of a charlie horse between the ears have I given you? :) It's not so easy, is it?

Mark

*if both piles are bivariate N(sigma,mu) distributions and one of the two piles is at (x=0,y=0) then for a distance d apart the other distribution will have to satisfy d^2=[diff in x]^2 + [diff in y]^2 by the pythagorean theorem.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page