LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 3 May 2000 15:18:22 -0700
Reply-To:     glaser@pacific-science.com
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dale Glaser <glaser@PACIFIC-SCIENCE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Alpha for dichotomous variables
Comments: To: Jocelyn Bisson <jbisson@VIF.CA>
In-Reply-To:  <000901bfb54a$836e1420$933d0dd8@jbisson.dsuper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

I've computed by hand the Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) for a cluster of items, and when compared to the coefficient alpha from the SPSS output, they're virtually the same, so I haven't had any problems with using the reliability procedure in SPSS for dichotomous items......however, other's may have different opinions!!.........dale glaser -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of Jocelyn Bisson Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:57 PM To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Alpha for dichotomous variables

Hello list.

I'd like to assess the internal consistency of scale made of dichotomous variables (yes / no), ans I was wondering if the alpha statistic as computed in "Reliability" was appropriate for the purpose.

Is it outright inappropriate, somewhat appropriate (why), or totally appropriate ?

Would there be a better test for the purpose ?

And if the scale contains dichotomous and Likert scales ... ?

Thank you very much for your comments.

J. Bisson Research associate U. of Montreal


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page