LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2000, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:51:46 -0400
Reply-To:     "Willis, James" <James.Willis@BCBSFL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Willis, James" <James.Willis@BCBSFL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Suggestion: Offer a reward for finding errors in documentatio
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

To requote what was so eloquently said:

Did you ever see a house fly?

Spell checkers would not see the error.

> ---------- > From: Michael S Hines[SMTP:mshines@PURDUE.EDU] > Reply To: Michael S Hines > Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 4:05 PM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Offer a reward for finding errors in > documentation > > Personal observation - reading is becoming a lost art, and proof reading > an > even more lost art. > > proof - the newspapers, SAS Documentation, ... > > A wise old sage once said - "There is no difference between a person who > cannot read, and one who does not". (or something like that). > > proof - all the "read the fine manuals" comments here (or maybe not so > fine > now?).... > > M Hines > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of Jack > Hamilton > Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 1:02 PM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Suggestion: Offer a reward for finding errors in documentation > > > SAS Institute should follow Donald Knuth's practice of awarding > $2.56 to the first discoverer of an error in one of his books. > > See <http://Sunburn.Stanford.EDU/~knuth/taocp.html>: > > Rewards > > The first finder of any error in my books receives $2.56; > significant suggestions are also worth $0.32 each. At present > the books are almost brand new, so your chances of finding a > previously unreported error today are much better than they > will be a month from now. Indeed, if you are really a careful > reader, you may be able to recoup more than the cost of the > books this way. > > > > "John Iwaniszek" <jiwaniszek@NC.RR.COM> wrote: > > >Has anyone else noticed a large number of missleading and incorrect > >information in the V8 online docs? For example, in the entry about Proc > >Printto, the NEW option syntax is listed as NEW='filename', not NEW > >FILE='filename' or NEW PRINT='filename', etc. > > > >Granted I am still using 612 but I would not expect the syntax to change > >this radically. Of course, they could have left the old functionality > >alone and added the NEW= option. > > > > -- > > Development Manager, Technical Group > METRICS Department, First Health > West Sacramento, California USA > >

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page