Date:         Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:31:12 -0700
Reply-To:     kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM
Subject:      Re: "reverse" lag
Comments: To: Ian Whitlock <WHITLOI1@westat.com>
In-Reply-To:  <no.id>; from WHITLOI1@WESTAT.COM on Tue, Jun 27,
              2000 at 08:27:06AM -0400
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:27:06AM -0400, Ian Whitlock wrote:
> Karsten,
> 
> I don't think it is the year that he wants lagged, it is the returns.  

I suggested as much.  However, I'm also working on the consultant's
principle of first giving the customer what they *ask* for, then giving
them what they *want* <g>.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>         http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
  Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                       http://www.opensales.org
   What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
     http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/      K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595  DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0

[application/pgp-signature]