| Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:06:07 -0500 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | Dianne Rhodes <RHODESD1@WESTAT.COM> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | Dianne Rhodes <RHODESD1@WESTAT.COM> |
|---|
| Subject: | implied RETURN |
|---|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
|---|
Puddin' man wrote
>I don't think you have to pass thru the implied RETURN
>to increment _N_.
yeah, I don't think its correct to say pass thru. RETURN returns you to
where you started. In a data step that's to the top of the data step. In a
linked procedure, the return takes you back to where you executed the link.
You don't "pass thru" a RETURN. According to the documentation, its "the
last executable" statement in a datastep. It's equivalant to a PL/1 RETURN.
Dianne Louise Rhodes
Sr. Systems Analyst
Westat
(xxx) 315-5977 work
(xxx) 315-5934 fax
| 
