LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2000)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:04:13 -0500
Reply-To:   "C. Mitchell Dayton" <cd4@UMAIL.UMD.EDU>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "C. Mitchell Dayton" <cd4@UMAIL.UMD.EDU>
Subject:   Re: comparing b's or beta's
Comments:   To: glaser@pacific-science.com
In-Reply-To:   <000901c04a6f$a463c0c0$1400a8c0@daleglas.PSE>
Content-Type:   TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

The coefficient for the product (interaction) term becomes an "offset" for the slope coefficient of the group coded as 0. For your case, the zero-coded group slope is, say, .2339, then the offset slope (interaction) coefficient would be -.0164. The t test for this coefficient is exactly the test you want for the difference in slopes.

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000 09:08:12 -0800 Dale Glaser <glaser@pacific-science.com> wrote:

> On the face of it this seems reasonable, however, to put this in context, a > study I was recently involved in, the unstandardized slope for a > fibromyalgia group was .2175 and for arthritic group was .2339, and when > interested in comparing the difference between the slopes for the two > groups, I'm not clear how creating an interaction term with the dummy coded > vector will ultimately answer the research question..........dale > > -----Original Message----- > From: William B. Ware [mailto:wbware@email.unc.edu] > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 8:53 AM > To: Dale Glaser > Cc: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: comparing b's or beta's > > Would it be appropriate to "dummy" the gender variable and include it > along with its interactions... the tests on the interactions would be > tests for the equality of the regression coefficients, would they not? > > WBW > > __________________________________________________________________________ > William B. Ware, Professor and Chair Educational Psychology, > CB# 3500 Measurement, and Evaluation > University of North Carolina PHONE (919)-962-7848 > Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3500 FAX: (919)-962-1533 > http://www.unc.edu/~wbware/ EMAIL: wbware@unc.edu > __________________________________________________________________________ > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Dale Glaser wrote: > > > Wim.......in the past I have used the formula from Cohen and Cohen (1983) > on > > page 56 when comparing the significance of the difference between > > independent Betas....Zar (1999) in chapter 18 (p. 360) in his > > Biostatistical Analysis text also has a section on comparing two slopes; > > however, and unfortunately I did not save it, I know some one developed a > > macro for the test of two independent betas..............hope this > > helps..........dale glaser > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of > Wim > > Beyers > > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:22 PM > > To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > > Subject: comparing b's or beta's > > > > Dear all, > > > > After having applied a hierarchical regression procedure in two > > groups separately (boys and girls) I want to compare the estimated > > parameters between the two groups, e.g. the b's (regression weights) or > > beta's (standardized). Is there any way to do it, either with computer > > power, either by hand (e.g. a kind of z-test like we have for comparing > > correlations) ? > > Someone with experience in this matter ? > > -- > > Wim Beyers > >

---------------------- C. Mitchell Dayton, Professor Department of Measurement & Statistics and Joint Program in Survey Methodology cd4@umail.umd.edu


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page