LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2001, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2001 10:16:04 -0700
Reply-To:   kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM>
Subject:   Re: Was: SAS and Samba...again
In-Reply-To:   <9d8r7n$hbvep$1@ID-75503.news.dfncis.de>; from magatz@YAHOO.COM on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:05:04PM +0200
Content-Type:   multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";

on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:05:04PM +0200, Andrea Magatti (magatz@YAHOO.COM) wrote: > This time i'm trying to be more clear: > > The architecture "now": > > Compute Server: on a Sun Solaris server (E6500) > > Client: Win NT 4, using client SAS from a local File Server. that means: > each time a client calls SAS.EXE > this has to be retrieved from the local file server, the same appens for > each DLL pointed by a SAS module (AF, GRAPH, EIS etc...). This way each > client has a pure "SAS client installation". > > I would be pleased to know wheter: > 1) can i put the SAS executable on a Samba network drive. This way i can > point a logical drive to the Samba share on th Sun Solaris machine, avoiding > this way to use the File Server (too busy for "real" file sharing) > 2) has anyone tested this kind of architectural, with an heavy SAS > application (AF developed) , with a lot of client server interaction ? > > Thanks in advance (first to Kasten....)

I don't see any reason it shouldn't work, you might want to just give it a shot.

You're already running SAS from a networked fileserver, Samba is pretty much a functional equivalent for WinNT/2K in this regard. You're not running SAS from the Solaris box, you're hosting it there. Though fnord knows, the wrath of SAS/Legal may descend on you for this....

Any reason you can't just try (and report back the results)?

Cheers.

-- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org


[application/pgp-signature]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page