LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2001, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 28 Jul 2001 17:21:03 -0400
Reply-To:     Steve Rowe <steverowe@EMAIL.MSN.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Steve Rowe <steverowe@EMAIL.MSN.COM>
Subject:      'weight' variable problem?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Some SAS/STAT procedures use a ‘weight’ variable. Specifically, proc discrim allows a weight statement/variable, and says it is similar to the freq statement/variable. The weights are described as ‘relative weights’, but there is no suggestion that the weights must add to 1 ... yet I wonder?

I have a report that proc discrim in V8 can produce an incorrect actual_X_predicted table when there are weights. Specifically, using client- supplied weights that summed to about 50 times the unweighted base size, the table showed that every observation was classified into "other" because it did not meet the a specified minimum posterior probability threshold of 0.5. When the weights were divided by 50, the procedure worked fine. Does anyone know anything more about this?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page