LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2001, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:57:39 -0700
Reply-To:     kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM>
Subject:      Re: Eliminate useless vars using proc sql ??
In-Reply-To:  <OFF537B7D8.AF4ACE78-ON88256A9A.00601583@rtp.epa.gov>; from
              Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV on Tue, Jul 31,
              2001 at 10:35:53AM -0700
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";

on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:35:53AM -0700, David L. Cassell (Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV) wrote: > Harry Droogendyk wrote [in part]: > > I much prefer top posting. > > I on the other hand, *vastly* prefer bottom-posting, with proper > quote-trimming by all authors as we go. Note how I have taken just > the pieces of your text that I wanted to reply to, and answered where > it was appropriate [and hopefully readable]. > > > Why scroll through the entire thread to see the most recent > > contribution? > > Because a thread may involve the inputs of multiple contributors. > Top-posting quickly causes unreadability and massive confusion in such > a case. OTOH, bottom-posting with proper trimming can make even an > exchange between a dozen people readable. And if proper trimming is > done, then the thread is short enough that you don't have to scroll > through reams of printout to find what you're looking for.

Bottom posting (which I generally refer to as postfix response) also follows a conversational question-answer format. Do you answer questions before they're answered?

I'll generally delete posts in which prefix response is used, particularly if quote attribution is also mangled, to the point that tracing flow of thought is not immediately apparent.

My golden rule of list and Usenet posting: you're asking a favor of your readers. Seek clarity of expression, you may be rewarded.

-- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org Free Dmitry!! Boycott Adobe!! Repeal the DMCA!! http://www.freedmitry.org


[application/pgp-signature]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page