| Date: | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:01:15 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Proc compare and floating point differences |
| In-Reply-To: | <14ce1c21.0108221413.5a3290d4@posting.google.com>; from
paszty@XOMA.COM on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:13:19PM -0700 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; |
|---|
on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:13:19PM -0700, Nick Paszty (paszty@XOMA.COM) wrote:
> hello.
>
> i extracted a 6.12 unix data set from an xpt file onto our vms system
> using 6.12. when i run proc compare between our source data and the
> extracted data, i get very small differences like 8.184e-16. i would
> like to use an alternative method to exact and it seems that 3 exist,
> absolute, relative and percent. these methods will yield no unequal
> values in my proc compare output. for floating point discrepancies,
> is one of these methods better than the others?
>
> i am also outputing the differences to an out= data set. i have read
> up on the kinds of values that dump out to the data set.
> E= equal value numeric
> .=equal value character
You've investicated the CRITERION= option?
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
[application/pgp-signature]
|