LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2001, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:41:30 GMT
Reply-To:     Ace <b.rogers@VIRGIN.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Ace <b.rogers@VIRGIN.NET>
Subject:      Re: SAS Comments

On 20 Sep 01 15:31:58 GMT, John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK (John Whittington) wrote:

>At 13:46 20/09/01 +0000, Ace wrote (in part): > >>Sorry, I haven't kept up with this one, buit what's wrong with /* */ ? >> >>It's been the standard quoting technique in SAS since the very first >>versions, where it was borrowed (along with the rest of the data step >>language) directly from PL/1. > >Nothing is 'wrong' with it, provided that a subsequent programmer (even >oneself, in some cases!) doesn't come along and use that same construct to >'comment out' blocks of code.

Yes, I take your point. But I'd prefer, as you suggest, to target that programmer rather than the original one. And I can't agree that there are better ways to comment out blocks of code - if it's just for testing they should only submit the step(s) they're testing, otherwise unwanted code should be completely removed. Save it in an 'old' version, by all means, but don't leave it in a production program.

-- Ace in Basel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page