LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2001, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:39:47 -0400
Reply-To:     "Diskin, Dennis" <Dennis.Diskin@PHARMA.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Diskin, Dennis" <Dennis.Diskin@PHARMA.COM>
Subject:      Re: Speed of =: vs. SUBSTR()...
Comments: To: Gerhard Hellriegel <ghellrieg@T-ONLINE.DE>
Content-Type: text/plain


I don't mean to jump on you but this is an over generalization.

Not all functions are implemented as calls to programs, many compilers implement some built-in function calls as in-line code depending on the types of the arguments. Conversely, just because something is coded as an operator, does not mean it is implemented as in-line code. For example, exponentiation is generally handled as a program call regardless of whether it is coded as an operator or a function. Again, in this case some compilers will optimize the code when one or more of the arguments are constants, especially if they are integers..

Dennis Diskin

> -----Original Message----- > From: Gerhard Hellriegel [SMTP:ghellrieg@T-ONLINE.DE] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:18 AM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Speed of =: vs. SUBSTR()... > > Simply, whithout testing: the operator =: has to be faster, because the > implementation of an operator is can be much more efficient, than a > function (subroutine) call (no parameter passing, always in memory because > not much code, ...)! Otherwise I'd say, the implementation is stupid. > The thing, that subsequent calls of a function sometimes is faster: the > function is a peace of code, maybe located in a DLL. This has to be loaded > in memory by the first call. If you have enough real memory the chance is > good, that it rests in the real memory for a while and can be reused > without loading again.

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page