```Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:18:21 -0500 Reply-To: "Burleson,Joseph A." Sender: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" From: "Burleson,Joseph A." Subject: DV's with neg numbers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" There is no effect of having negative numbers as part of the continuum of the dependent variable. Means, variances, and SD's are calculated the same, as are the z-score transformations that precede the formulation of the standardized regression coefficients. The unstandardized coefficients remain in terms of the original units of the DV (and the respective IV's). If you need to transform the DV, however, due to skewness, which can easily happen with income variables, be careful. A natural log transform, for example, would require you to make the range of the Net Worth have as its lowest value, some positive number, but not zero or negative numbers. You could solve this by adding the positive value of the lowest negative number plus \$1: COMPUTE newvar = oldvar + 888001. That would make the lowest value equal 1, and the highest value equal 2888001. Then you could transform if the skewness is positive (tail right): COMPUTE lnvar = LN(newvar) . If the skewness is negative (tail to the left), you could then "mirror" the DV's by subtracting the new variable from the highest value (plus one) of the resultant new variable: COMPUTE newvar2 = 2888002 - newvar. Then log as before: COMPUTE lnvar = LN(newvar2) . Keep track of the "inverted" variable, now defined as "negative Net Worth." Back transform (in two steps) to get back to the orignal means. Good luck! -Joe Burleson ```

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page