LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2002)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:10:17 -0500
Reply-To:     "Cohen,Diane" <dc42@EXCHANGE1.DREXEL.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Cohen,Diane" <dc42@EXCHANGE1.DREXEL.EDU>
Subject:      "r" cutoff
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear Listers,

I have run some social science correlations, all of which are significant (p=<.001). They have to do with correlations between total depression scores and job satisfaction scores, anxiety scores and life satisfaction scores, etc. I now need to know what the 'r' cut off is in determining which of these correlations are really worth reporting. My business major son says r's below .45 are not very interesting or worthwhile...my boss (a physician) says all are worthwhile - whether .131 or .777. What do you social science folks say??

Diane


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page