Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 09:07:51 -0400
Reply-To: "Goldman, Brad (AT-Atlanta)" <Brad.Goldman@AUTOTRADER.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: "Goldman, Brad (AT-Atlanta)" <Brad.Goldman@AUTOTRADER.COM>
Subject: SAS-L Etiquette (and benefits)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> From: Ian Whitlock <WHITLOI1@WESTAT.COM>
> Subject: SAS-L Etiquette (and benefits)
> Quentin, I whole heartedly agree with the thought that a
> summarized solution
> should be presented for the benefit of all and for the
> benefit of one to
> stop a flood of mail and to learn more in making the summary.
> I would also add that there are some very sharp people out
> there who only
> answer privately.
Note that in this case, some of the problems were caused by digest (with
I replied to the digest and to the original poster. Apparently, she got her
answer from me, and responded to that answer, and had her answer posted in
the next digest before my answer ever made it to the digest. In addition, I
was careless and forgot to change the subject in my reply, so anyone
following by thread would not have seen my answer.
I hope no one avoids the public forum for fear of judgement, this is the
nicest, most professionally run, most helpful list I have ever encountered.