LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2002, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:09:43 -0700
Reply-To:     Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Why SAS is the best ??
Comments: To: Pawel Manowiecki <pawel.manowiecki@WP.PL>
In-Reply-To:  <af867j$kn4$1@news.tpi.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Pawel,

This subject comes up regularly on SAS-L. I like SAS for its data manipulation capabilities. You can operate on larger data volumes with SAS than you can with most other languages. The syntax of the data step is much clearer (to me) than the syntax of a lot of other languages. The different types of merge and set operations along with joins in SQL cannot be beat by any other language. Also, I like language which allows batch submission, and SAS is better at batch submission than many of the other statistical programming languages. A lot of languages are tailored more for interactive analysis of smaller datasets. Batch submission is not the intended form of usages for many statistical programming languages. The SAS macro language is a powerful tool which allows many difficult problems to be solved fairly easily.

Still, SAS is not as flexible as many other statistical programming languages. If you want to code some new algorithm, it can be more work to implement in SAS. If you have the procedure IML licensed, you can code just about any algorithm that you desire, but you might have to do more coding than you would have to with, say, S-plus. Matrix operations are not integrated with the rest of the language in the way that they are in S-plus or Stata. SAS cannot perform operations on imaginary numbers, which some other languages can. I have not yet encountered a situation where that was of concern to me. But it is a limitation on the part of SAS.

These are just a few thoughts on what is good and what is not so good about SAS. Much more could be said.

Dale

--- Pawel Manowiecki <pawel.manowiecki@WP.PL> wrote: > My questions are today simple :) > Tell me. > Why do you think SAS is the best / or is better then other > stat-software ? > What for you are using it ? > > Tnx, > Pawel Manowiecki > pawel.manowiecki@wp.pl > Student > Department of Economics > Warsaw University > Poland

===== --------------------------------------- Dale McLerran Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center mailto: dmclerra@fhcrc.org Ph: (206) 667-2926 Fax: (206) 667-5977 ---------------------------------------

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page