LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2002, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:03:00 -0400
Reply-To:     "Richard A. DeVenezia" <radevenz@IX.NETCOM.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Richard A. DeVenezia" <radevenz@IX.NETCOM.COM>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Subject:      Re: Big SAS Job
Content-Type: text/plain;

"John Whittington" <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK> wrote in message news:5.1.0.14.2.20020721005649.04910d50@pop3.powernet.co.uk... > At 23:17 20/07/02 +0000, Barry Schwarz wrote: > > >Why do you think it would violate the license for a service bureau to > >run SAS on behalf of a paying customer? My license allows me to run > >on my CPU without qualification for the duration of the license. It > >does not say that I cannot accept outside work. > > Barry, this is one of those occasions on which I'm rather glad I'm not a > lawyer, because I can see (and partially sympathise with) both sides of > this argument. > > My first inclination was to reply exactly as you did. Almost all of those > who license SAS and who are involved in 'consultancy' (in the broadest of > sense of the word) run SAS code on their machines, and provide the results > of that SAS processing to their paying clients/ customers (many/most of > whom will not have licensed SAS), presumably legitimately in terms of their > licenses (that's why they pay for the licenses!). One can therefore argue > that the situation is not really any different if the code is provided by > the client in question, rather than developed in-house, or obtained from a > third-party source, or whatever. > > Although I am still inclined to the above view, I can see (and have some > sympathy for) the opposing one - particularly if the client/customer in > question does not license SAS. If you had ('exclusively') licensed SAS and > allowed members of other organisations to come and sit at one of your > workstations (or to log in to your system, from wherever) and run code of > their own (probably for 'commercial gain') using your licensed SAS system, > then I think that would be a violation of your license, wouldn't it? (and > clearly to the potential financial disadvantage of SI). If so, then why > would it become different if it were your finger which ('for a price', none > of which would benefit SI directly) pressed the 'submit button' (to run > their code)? > > This is perhaps an even greater issue (in the eyes of SI's lawyers) in view > of the ongoing discussions here about 'SAS LE'. The more I read of that > thread, the more it seems (to me) that at least some people are thinking of > LE as something very different from (and 'more' than) simply a 'learning' > edition - and (particularly if one wore an SI hat!) one might envisage > people/organistaions developing code using LE and then buying a small > amount of time on some other organisation's licensed SAS installation to > run it, for their 'commercial gain', without having licensed SAS. >

Actually, I think this is just the type of venue/customer SAS is going after with their SAS Hosting Partner Program. While the main thrust of the program is for perhaps letting Company A outsource it's data warehouse/mart to Company X, I don't think it precludes Company X from satisfying a business request of 'run my code'. If SAS can't get the money from Company A, they get at least a piece from X and it's upto X to make itself profitable.

All things being liquid, maybe in a X units of time there will be SAS versions named Learning Edition, Personal Edition, Professional Edition, Enterprise Edition, Alacarte Edition and Full Service Buffet Edition.

> Maybe if I read the SAS licence's T&C's carefully it would become more > clear to me - but it looks to me as if their could well be scope for > lawyers to make a lot of money from debating this one! > > Kind Regards, > > > John > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 > Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 > Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: John.W@mediscience.co.uk > Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------

-- Richard A. DeVenezia http://www.devenezia.com/downloads/sas/macros


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page