Date:         Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:12:12 +0200
Reply-To:     Annette <anne5432@UNI.DE>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Annette <anne5432@UNI.DE>
Subject:      How to interpret ASEs in PROC FREQ output
Comments: To: SASL <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I forward this question from a friend of mine. I wasn't too sure about the
exact answer: "How could I interpret the ASEs of the MEASURES option in  the
PROC FREQ output? ASE does not mean significance, does it? How comes that
PROC FREQ gives out : Pearson Correlation  r=0.1383 and p=
0.0394, while the PEARSON coefficient (calculated by PROC CORR) results in
r=0.13828 and  p=0.0007 for the same data. Why are the Ps different? Has it
to do with the ASE? Effective sample size is identical. Thank you".
Thank Annette