Date:         Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:37 -0400
Reply-To:     "Goldman, Brad (AT-Atlanta)" <Brad.Goldman@AUTOTRADER.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Goldman, Brad (AT-Atlanta)" <Brad.Goldman@AUTOTRADER.COM>
Subject:      Re: Subscriber's Only?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Disagree -- the minimum is filters that do this automatically, or putting
one-time burden in at subscribe time.  The "keyword" solution calls for
extra effort for each and every message posted. Note that for digest folks
like myself, it is not simply a question of hitting reply, one must actually
cut and paste the subject in (The default for this email was "RE: SAS-L
Digest - 16 Oct 2002 - Special issue (#2002-1486)").  I would not like to
have my posts deleted if I forgot that step, as does happen occasionally.  A
one time burden at subscribe time seems most reasonable, IMHO.  Let's see
what J Kelly can come with.

> Date:    Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:35:06 -0400
> From:    Philip Whittall <philip.whittall@UNILEVER.COM>
> Subject: Re: Subscriber's Only?
>
> I concur with the suggestion of always including a keyword
> eg: SASUSER in the title. Simple, effective and generates
> the minimum dislocation to the current way that it works.