LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2002, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:39:02 -0800
Reply-To:     pdm@SPIKEWARE.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Paul McDonald <pdm@SPIKEWARE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Set statement bug?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Thanks, John... and your comments are coming across as very kind, as I hope mine are too!

I'm quoting you here: "I really think there is only ONE reason to 'avoid' them - namely if the person writing the code isn't confident enough that (s)he understands the SET statement well enough to know (i.e. 'be able to predict') how that code will behave."

I tend to look at things from another angle. If you join me from this viewpoint, I think you will then understand why I make comments like I do. And to express my viewpoint, I want to build on your statement above.

I believe there is another reason not to get too complex with SAS code - and that is if the person writing the code isn't confident enough that the end user or supporter of the production code will understand the SAS code.

In summary, I don't write code based on whether or not I will understand it, but whether or not someone else will understand it.

Separately, I would like to see a case where it would be a good idea to use more than one SET statement in the same data step!

Paul D. McDonald, CEO SPIKEware, Inc. --------------------- Get Free SAS Programming Tutorials and Cool SAS Macros!

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page