LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2002, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:45:03 GMT
Reply-To:     David Wright <David_wright@SPRA.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Wright <David_wright@SPRA.COM>
Organization: Your Company
Subject:      Re: Set statement bug?

OK, I too did not get the job.

But I would very pleased if Ian Whitlock could provide us with a single example of why a logical person would use two set statements in a single datastep (other than those mentioned, of course).

At least I could take this to my next job interview. That, along with the three ampersand technique and using .Z .

WHITLOI1@WESTAT.COM (Ian Whitlock) wrote in <08B08C9FA5EBD311A2CC009027D5BF8102E2B523@remailnt2-re01.westat.com>: ... > Give 10 different examples where it would be convenient > to have two or more different SET statements in a DATA step. >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page