LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2002)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:25:52 -0500
Reply-To:     Rob Penfold <penfoldr@sympatico.ca>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Rob Penfold <penfoldr@sympatico.ca>
Subject:      conditional logistic fails - nested solution in SPSS?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I've run a conditional logistic regression and completed some tests of the IIA assumption (deleting alternatives and looking at the consistency of the parameters). In 2/119 cases the coefficients are inconsistent when the alternative is deleted (i.e. I estimated the model 119 times since each individual chooses from 120 alternatives). I don't know how to get the covariance matrix from SPSS in order to do the Hausman test. I can't afford STATA ($500 US for a grad student!!!!).

Is there a way to trick SPSS into doing a nested logistic regression? If not, can I estimate separate conditional logit models - one for each of the branches (groups 1, 2, 3) as an equivalent procedure? My tree is below.

Store / \ Cluster Spatial Monopoly (zero competitors within 400m) / | \ (# competitors within 400m) 1 2 3 /|\ /|\ \ L1...L22 L3, L8, L21 L1 (locations where this happens - i.e. choices)

Thanks a million,

Rob

Rob Penfold PhD candidate Department of Geography University of Toronto ________________________________________________

Scientia Est Potentia


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page