LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2003)Back to main GABO-L pageJoin or leave GABO-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:37:17 -0500
Reply-To:     Eran Tomer <etomer@EMORY.EDU>
Sender:       Georgia Birders Online <GABO-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Eran Tomer <etomer@EMORY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Waxwings
In-Reply-To:  <002101c2ce8e$a3931b00$6501a8c0@Marion>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Marion,

Many thanks for the data, especially the Georgia-specific figures. Also, you are right in stating that many factors have to be considered when looking at CBC and BBS data. Cedar Waxwing is one species that is not adequately monitored by either survey due to the methodology involved. This species is gregarious, so spatial data is highly clumped, tough to chart accurately and is sometimes autocorrelated. Then, Waxwings flocks are difficult to count with precision and trend data is biased as a result of flocking behavior. This bird is also nomadic, irruptive in some places, nests in loose colonies, is somewhat of a food specialist and, in some settings, can be difficult to hear. All of these bias standard CBC and BBS methods. That is not to say that waxwing data from these surveys is not valuable. It does provide a very useful index and a good overview of geographical occurrence. However, interpreting negative data (lack of sightings) or population trends can be very tricky here.

Data for the southern Blue Ridge may well end up indicating trouble, however. Significant population declines have been documented with reasonable confidence for many forest birds there, including those that are not neotropical migrants. This is not surprising in light of all the assaults this region has been sustaining, from development to forest tree epidemics to air pollution. While most species cannot maintain the same numbers today as they could 30 years ago as a result, it is fortunate that few are in imminent danger.

Best regards,

- Eran Tomer Atlanta, GA etomer@emory.edu

********** To search GABO-L archives or manage your subscription, go to http://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/gabo-l.html

To contact a listowner, send message to GABO-L-request@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

To view GABO-L information/guidelines, go to http://www.gos.org/gabo.html


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main GABO-L page