LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:13:12 -0600
Reply-To:     Thompson Bill T Contr USAFSAM/FEC <Bill.Thompson@brooks.af.mil>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Thompson Bill T Contr USAFSAM/FEC <Bill.Thompson@brooks.af.mil>
Subject:      Post Hoc mystery
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

In writing the code for performing a MANOVA I included the code for performing post hoc tests on the main effects before knowing if they were significant. Interestingly the results showed no main effect for my variable but when looking at the bonferroni (only 3 levels of indep. var.) post hoc it showed significance. Even more interesting is that in another analysis the exact opposite occurred where there was a significant main effect but post hoc analysis did not identify a significant relationship.

Your thoughts please and any help in interpreting these results is greatly appreciated.

Bill

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin 1759


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page