LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:00:38 -0500
Reply-To:   Art@DrKendall.org
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Arthur J. Kendall" <Art@DrKendall.org>
Organization:   Social Research Consultants
Subject:   Re: Negative Coeeficient Alphas
Comments:   To: Spencer Baker <srbaker54@cox.net>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

The most likely reasons are 1) that you have not keyed all of your items in the same direction, i.e., the higher numerical item score should indicate a higher score on the summated scale. or 2) that you have not put the correct items into the correct scales.

Check the matrix of interitem correlations, if there are any negative correlation among items they should be of trivial magnitude. Check the corrected item-total correlation, squared multiple correlation, and alpha-if-item-deleted.

Hope this helps.

Art Art@DrKendall.org Social Research Consultants University Park, MD USA (301) 864-5570

Spencer Baker wrote: > I am using an instrument that has lower level scales and an overall > scale. It was originally created for adults and I am using it with a > much younger population to compare. I am receiving some low and > negative coefficient alphas at the lower level scales but the overall > scales are in the .70s. > > Is there an article that discusses this phenomenon? It is a small > sample (N=151) so far. > > TIA > > Spencer >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page