LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2003, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:56:00 -0400
Reply-To:     John Stimpson <john.stimpson@UK.FID-INTL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Stimpson <john.stimpson@UK.FID-INTL.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS/Intrnet - App dispatcher ports becoming unavailable

Hello

Some of you may remember the post below from last year. At the time, no solution was found, so it is a problem we have lived with since then. At this years SUGI I brought this up with SAS/Intrnet development staff, and after some investigation it was determined that this was caused by a load manager bug (specific to load manager running on Solaris, I believe). This has been fixed in version 9.1, and we are now running without problems using load manager (version 9.1) and application server (version 8.2). So if you suffer from something similar to what is described below, it may be worth contacting SI to see if the 9.1 solution will work for you.

Best Regards

John Stimpson Data Warehouse Team Fidelity Investments Internal: 8-724-6342 External: 01737 836342

Fidelity Investments International, Fidelity Investment Services Limited, Fidelity Pensions Management and Financial Administration Services Limited (a Fidelity Group company) are all regulated in the UK by the FSA and have their registered offices at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on its products and does not give investment advice to private clients based on individual circumstances. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be subject to our monitoring procedures..

On Wed, 1 May 2002 04:42:56 -0400, John Stimpson <john.stimpson@UK.FID- INTL.COM> wrote:

>Hello > >I am having a problem with the Application Dispatcher that I thought I >would send to the list, as I am sure it must have been seen before. We are >running SAS 8.2 on Solaris 2.6. The application I have developed uses the >load manager to launch SAS processes as required, and I have made a range >of 10 ports available to support these processes. In the broker >configuration file, I have set the MinRun parameter to 1, so that there >will always be 1 SAS process running to support incoming requests. The >issue I am seeing can best be described by example - here is what is >occuring. > > - Port number "1" is processing requests. > - A new request comes in, and a SAS process is opened on port number "2" >to process this request. > - Users on port "1" cease activity, and the SAS process on port "1" shuts >down in accordance with the timeout directive. Port "2" is still processing >requests. > - A new request comes in while processing is occuring on Port "2", and a >new session is opened by the load manager on Port "3". > >This is the problem. Even though Port "1" is not in use, this port is not >used - instead, the process is started on the next available Port. The >cycle will repeat down the list of ports until it runs out of available >ports, and then the application no longer functions. The load manager must >then be stopped and restarted. The software does not seem to recognise that >higher ports are now available and can be used. I do not believe this issue >is caused by application errors, although this is something not yet fully >investigated. > >Before I start modifying the Broker configuration, I would very much like >to hear from people who have some thoughts on what is happening here, and >what can be done about it. > >Thanks as always > >John


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page