LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (June 2003, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:53:39 +0100
Reply-To:     brookemaury@mindspring.com
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Brooke Maury <brookemaury@YAHOO.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: How to speed up a SAS process?
In-Reply-To:  <OFF8DBFCC3.9E1D3F0E-ON88256D4B.005E9FE4@rtp.epa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

totally forgot about that -- on our UNIX box (E6500) we tried installing 64 bit SyncSort as the 'HOST' sort procedure for SAS -- we benchmarked before and after and SyncSort actually looked sluggish.

with that said, it's still a great tool for stand along sorting on flat file or something...

--- "David L. Cassell" <cassell.david@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV> wrote: > Sheila J Gross <sheilaandhercats@EROLS.COM> replied: > > My local SUG just had a presentation by the people > from Syncsort, an > add-in > > which is claimed to be anywhere up to 90% faster > than the internal > sort in > > SAS. I'm sure they have a web site, I just don't > have the URL handy. > > Just as an aside, SyncSort *can* make a huge > difference in sorting > speed, on Big Iron. Paul Dorfman has written about > it in this forum, > so anyone can go look up his posts on the subject in > the SAS-L archives. > > BUT.. SyncSort is probably not the solution on unix > boxes or win32 > boxes. The fine-tuning of I/O that makes SyncSort > so remarkably > effective on IBM mainframes doesn't seem to be there > yet for other > systems. On unix boxes (not all unices are > supported), there is > some improvement in sort speed, but not all that > much. And rumors > have it that the speed-up from multi-processing in > SAS 9 PROC SORT > gives it an advantage over SyncSort on win32 > systems. > > Anyway, as "SAS User" has pointed out, sorting the > data set may be > the wrong thing to do anyway... > > HTH, > David > -- > David Cassell, CSC > Cassell.David@epa.gov > Senior computing specialist > mathematical statistician

__________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page