LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:28:19 +1000
Reply-To:     paulandpen@optusnet.com.au
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Paul Dickson <paulandpen@optusnet.com.au>
Subject:      Re: Cohen's Kappa for multiple judges
Comments: To: Simon Freidin <s.freidin@iaesr.unimelb.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi Stephen,

I have not used this but it may be of some use, and you can use it independently of SPSS. I have however, found other aspects of the website quite useful

http://members.aol.com/johnp71/javastat.html

Cheers Paul

> Simon Freidin <s.freidin@iaesr.unimelb.edu.au> wrote: > > http://www.spss.com/tech/answer/details.cfm?tech_tan_id=100010508 > > Multi-rater Kappa statistics in SPSS > > Current SPSS procedures offer only Cohen's original Kappa for two > raters > (this is provided in the CROSSTABS procedure; > Analyze->Descriptives->Crosstabs in the menus). There is a macro > (mkappasc.sps) available from SPSS that computes one version of a > multi-rater Kappa statistic. It is available from the SPSS web site > at: > > http://www.spss.com/tech/stat/macros.htm. > > Please make sure that you read the readme file with instructions on > how to > use the macro. > > The mkappasc.sps macro computes the multi-rater Kappa measure > discussed in > S. Siegel and J. N. Castellan's Nonparametric Statistics for the > Behavioral > Sciences, 2nd edition (1988, McGraw-Hill). Results include estimated > Kappa, > a standard error under the null hypothesis and a test of the null > hypothesis of a 0 population value. Note that there are multiple > definitions of agreement and chance agreement. This measure focuses > on > agreement between pairs of raters. It does not produce the same value > as > Cohen's original Kappa for the case of two raters. See Siegel and > Castellan > and the references cited therein for further information. > > > See also: > http://www.spss.com/tech/answer/details.cfm?tech_tan_id=100010887 > > regards > Simon > > At 03:13 PM 7/14/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >The average of all possible pair-wise Kappas. See Conger (1980), > Psych > >Bulletin, 88, 322-328. I've seen SAS macros but nothing for SPSS. > >--Steve > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Stephen Cox [mailto:sd.cox@qut.edu.au] > >Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:15 PM > >To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > >Subject: Cohen's Kappa for multiple judges > > > > > >Folks - Does anyone know the computational formula for calculating > the > >modified Kappa in the case of multiple judges (7 in this case) > categorising > >objects into a nominal scale (6 categories - included/excluded)? > > > >Is there a macro for this - I haven't been able to find one. > > > >Thanks all. > > > >Stephen Cox > > > >____________________________________________ > >Dr. Stephen Cox > >Faculty of Business Research Advisor > >Queensland University of Technology > >Room: 1st Floor, 126 Margaret Street > >Ph: 3864 9371 > >email: sd.cox@qut.edu.au > >CRICOS No. 00213J > > > > > >------------------------------- > >-- Even though this E-Mail has been scanned and found clean of > >-- known viruses, OPM can not guarantee this message is virus free. > >------------------------------- > >-- This message was automatically generated. > >-------------------------------di > > Research Database Manager and Analyst > Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research > The University of Melbourne > MELBOURNE VIC 3010 > Tel: (03) 8344 3601 Fax: (03) 8344 5630


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page