LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2003, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:59:24 +0300
Reply-To:     Akin Pala <akin@DR.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Akin Pala <akin@DR.COM>
Subject:      Re: REPEATED, UN, CS intraclass correlation

Is there any way to see messages related to me at the top instead of having to scroll down ever time I open outlook express 6? How do you guys do it? Anyhew, what I do is repeated and I have growing goat kids. Growth measures (weight, height etc) were taken every week for 17 weeks. So I might think there is an order within kid. To answer your question, I guess changing the order would certainly change the correlation structure. So I am assuming is the ante (1) method is just fine, here is the corr matrix for the first animal, untill week 9, calculated with CS:

Row Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4 Col5 Col6 Col7 Col8 Col9

1 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 2 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 3 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 4 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 5 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 6 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 7 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 0.3961 8 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 0.3961 9 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 1.0000 10 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 11 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 12 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 13 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 14 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 15 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 16 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 17 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961 0.3961

here is the corr matrix for the first animal, untill week 9 calculated with ante(1): Estimated R Correlation Matrix for KNo 2202

Row Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4 Col5 Col6 Col7 Col8 Col9

1 1.0000 0.8166 0.7718 0.7551 0.7284 0.6962 0.6725 0.6503 0.6337 2 0.8166 1.0000 0.9451 0.9247 0.8919 0.8525 0.8235 0.7963 0.7760 3 0.7718 0.9451 1.0000 0.9784 0.9437 0.9021 0.8714 0.8426 0.8211 4 0.7551 0.9247 0.9784 1.0000 0.9646 0.9220 0.8906 0.8611 0.8392 5 0.7284 0.8919 0.9437 0.9646 1.0000 0.9559 0.9233 0.8928 0.8700 6 0.6962 0.8525 0.9021 0.9220 0.9559 1.0000 0.9660 0.9340 0.9102 7 0.6725 0.8235 0.8714 0.8906 0.9233 0.9660 1.0000 0.9669 0.9423 8 0.6503 0.7963 0.8426 0.8611 0.8928 0.9340 0.9669 1.0000 0.9745 9 0.6337 0.7760 0.8211 0.8392 0.8700 0.9102 0.9423 0.9745 1.0000 10 0.6014 0.7364 0.7792 0.7964 0.8257 0.8638 0.8942 0.9248 0.9490 11 0.5846 0.7159 0.7575 0.7742 0.8027 0.8397 0.8693 0.8991 0.9226 12 0.5697 0.6976 0.7382 0.7544 0.7822 0.8183 0.8471 0.8761 0.8990 13 0.5603 0.6860 0.7259 0.7419 0.7692 0.8047 0.8331 0.8616 0.8841 14 0.5525 0.6766 0.7159 0.7317 0.7585 0.7936 0.8215 0.8496 0.8719 15 0.5376 0.6583 0.6965 0.7119 0.7381 0.7722 0.7994 0.8267 0.8483 16 0.5113 0.6261 0.6625 0.6772 0.7020 0.7345 0.7603 0.7863 0.8069 17 0.4919 0.6023 0.6373 0.6514 0.6753 0.7065 0.7314 0.7564 0.7762

Ante correlations are much higher and are different in different weeks. I think when I say ante (1) as opposed to saying somthing like ante (2), it takes first degree corr. only, adjacent corr only. Not sure if I am right though... I am in animal science and I had been doing nothing but animal science stuff, but it seems that next week I will have some repeated gender data and later something from a clinical trial with no correlation within subject (or that is what they say). So this is a verrry helpful discussion for me!

-- Akin Pala, Ph.D. http://akin.owns.it Tel: (286) 218 00 18 ext. 1349 "Akin Pala" <akin@dr.com> wrote in message news:3f0191b7@shknews01... > I can calculate intraclass correlation if I type > proc mixed etc.; > repeated/type=cs subject=id; > by correlation=common variance/common var+residual variance which is > something like > 0.74/(0.74 + 0.57) = 0.57. > RCORR gives me a 1. > Using UN with repeated/type=un subject=id; > gives me some other number like 1.30 > Is there any way to calculate intraclass correlation using Unstructured > (UN). > Also, is there any way to calculate that number in proc genmod repeated > statement? It does not accept rcorr; not that I saw any use for it :) > So, is there any one out there who knows the answer to those? I am just > confused about UN vs CS and I want to calculate intraclass corr using UN > because UN gives me Akaikes IC=+89.1 while CS gives me -90.1 and Schwarz > bayesian is -90.1 for UN and -92.1 for CS. > Thanks and I appreciate any answer... > > > -- > Akin Pala, Ph.D. > http://akin.owns.it > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page