LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2003, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:32:24 -0500
Reply-To:     Paul R Swank <Paul.R.Swank@UTH.TMC.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Paul R Swank <Paul.R.Swank@UTH.TMC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: GLM output of repeated measurements
Comments: To: Wolfgang Deimel <deimel@POST.MED.UNI-MARBURG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <3F2A17D9.29338.17B55A@localhost>

Different tests, partially different assumptions. The multivariate tests assumes multivariate normality whereas the univariate test assumes sphericity. If the sphericity test is violated then the univariate tends toward the liberal side and one tends to see more significant univariate tests than multivariate. Sphericity has to do with the structure of the variance covariance matrix. Proc Mixed gives one more flexibility wth the var-cov matrix than does univariate GLM. Thus, which one is more believable depends on the assumptions.

Paul R. Swank, Ph.D. Professor, Developmental Pediatrics Medical School UT Health Science Center at Houston


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page