LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:21:57 -0400
Reply-To:     Art@DrKendall.org
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Arthur J. Kendall" <Art@DrKendall.org>
Organization: Social Research Consultants
Subject:      Re: EDIT command
Comments: To: Raynald Levesque <rlevesque@videotron.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

See if this works on your version. get file . . . N of cases 3.

Art Art@DrKendall.org Social Research Consultants University Park, MD USA (301) 864-5570

Raynald Levesque wrote: > Hi > > I assume you do not want to run the syntax because you are dealing with > large data files. Why not run the syntax on a small sample of the data? > > Regards > > Raynald Levesque rlevesque@videotron.ca > Visit my SPSS site: http://pages.infinit.net/rlevesqu/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of > Tony Baglioni > Sent: September 2, 2003 10:43 AM > To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: EDIT command > > > Older versions of SPSS had an EDIT command that could be inserted into a > syntax file. This command would allow SPSS to check all the syntax for > errors without actually doing the analyses. I see in the Syntax Reference > Guide that this command is still present but "not available on all operating > systems." I'm using V11.5 and the command is not functional. Is there some > other way of checking syntax without running the proc? > > Thanks. > Tony >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page