LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2003, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:45:13 -0400
Reply-To:     "Fehd, Ronald J. (PHPPO)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Fehd, Ronald J. (PHPPO)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Subject:      Re: SAS or C
Comments: cc: "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <stanlep@EXTREMEZONE.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain

> From: Stanley A. Gorodenski [mailto:stanlep@EXTREMEZONE.COM] > I would like to get others opinions of certain aspects > of SAS vs. C.

for the record: SAS is written in C

SI purchased Lattice C http://www.lattice.com/otherdos.htm when it decided to do the multiplatform architecture thingy.

Ron Fehd the macro maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2@cdc.gov

If you always try to be logical, you probably won't ever have much sorrow, or much fun. -- Ashleigh Brilliant pot-shot #4438


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page