LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2003, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:40:26 -0700
Reply-To:     "Choate, Paul@DDS" <pchoate@DDS.CA.GOV>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Choate, Paul@DDS" <pchoate@DDS.CA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: SAS programmer vs. manager
Comments: To: Richard Liu <kataliu@EARTHLINK.NET>

Richard, (pardon my rant) - nobody here is laughing at you. I'm surprised that no-one mentioned that SAS programmers are usually more MIS than IS. SAS programmers who deliver information for management get the opportunity to deal with wide ranging issues and must understand the large pictures. I get more face time with senior staff, research, and field staff and in broader contexts than other "programmers" I work with. Information is at the heart of any business, so SAS experience would be a key asset for a management function. As a SAS programmer I understand not just the systems that house the data, the data in the systems, what the data mean, and for what they are useful.

People skills are not at odds with computer skills. Good MIS skills equate to understanding the audience and delivering to it, which translates to management skills. I have been in several situations where colleagues or superiors with weak analytical skills are afraid of exposure, and cover it up with this colleague's argument. It's illuminating that I also run into an opposite bias towards me as a SAS programmer, that I am not a "real programmer" since I am not tied to a particular data system. Most non-SAS programmers I've worked with have fairly narrow scopes, whereas SAS programmers are basically unbounded. Personally, I feel most at home with research, or as project support on ad-hoc, start-up, or analytical projects, not in an IT group, although being inside IT gives me the best access to the material vital for my function.

Being a wonk with any skill means narrow and deep, whereas management values a broad skills base (and high stress tolerance). But as the other posts comment, being an information guru doesn't mean you can't make the leap to being a leader; you just have to be able make the change and find fulfillment while forgoing an occupation where you have had success.

Paul Choate DDS Data Extraction (916) 654-2160

-----Original Message----- From: Richard Liu [mailto:kataliu@EARTHLINK.NET] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:58 PM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: SAS programmer vs. manager

Hi,

I just talked to my friends over the phone.

He is now a marketer with strong SAS capability in a marketing group in a banking industry. Moreover, he graduated from a famous marketing graduate school as well.

However, his colleagues who don't know SAS well were promoted as some kind of leads and he wasn't. And the reason he was told was modeler or SAS programmer should just be quiet and usually hasn't capability to manage people.

I don't know if it is right or wrong. But is it a common stereotype for "strong SAS" people?

Don't laugh at me. Does that mean people should not show their SAS ability or will be just labeled as "programmers"?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page