LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (November 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:02:50 -0500
Reply-To:     arnoldr@uwindsor.ca
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Robert Arnold <arnoldr@uwindsor.ca>
Subject:      posthoc tests in analysis of covariance
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hi. I'm not used to working with ANCOVA, so there may be an easy way to do what I would like to do, but haven't seen how to do. I would like to compare mean scores on a family functioning measure for people in different locations, controlling for their education and family income. Specifically, I would like to compare those in sites 1 and 2 with those in site 5 and those in site 3 with those site in 4.

The comparison is easy without the covariates. I can simply enter

ONEWAY famfunc by site with edlevel income / posthoc = <name of a chosen test> .

The output compares each site with each other, and I can examine the comparisons of interest, while ignoring the rest.

According to the documentation, the posthoc subcommand is available for UNIANOVA (the GLM univariate analysis command). When I try to use it, though, I get a message saying that the POSTHOC command is being ignored because there are covariates in the model. UNIANOVA will print out the differences between each site and a chosen reference site, but not output from POSTHOC.

Is there some other way to get comparisons between specific groups after controlling for covariates?

Thanks in advance for your help.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page