LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2003, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:00:37 -0800
Reply-To:     jas <jwortley@CHASS.UTORONTO.CA>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         jas <jwortley@CHASS.UTORONTO.CA>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      Skewed residuals in proc mixed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

I'm hoping that someone can help me with the following problem. I'm conducting analyses for my Ph.D. dissertation and have run into an issue that my advisors haven't been able to help me with.

I'm using census and population health data (N=38,000) and have a very skewed continuous dependent variable (i,e., distress). In using proc mixed in SAS, tests show that the residuals are, unfortunately, also very skewed. Several transformations did not significantly improve the appearance of the residuals (although the log-transformation looks the most promising). Tests for normality (i.e., the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises and the Anderson-Darling) show significant p-values but I'm not sure how applicable they are to such a large sample. Can I apply the BIC criteria to these tests, and if so, how?

Your advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Jas.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page