Date:         Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:00:09 -0500
Reply-To:     Quentin McMullen <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Quentin McMullen <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU>
Subject:      Re: rtf proc report compute _after_
Comments: To: Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM>

Thanks Jack, I guess that makes sense. After posting this question, I did
stumble across your review of this year's sasware ballot, and I take it
that its mention there:

>  PROC REPORT
>  68 provide the ability to determine the end of a physical page in
order to place LINE statements in COMPUTE AFTER _PAGE_ blocks for all
ODS destinations except OUTPUT

means that even if it *could* happen, it aint happened yet.  Sigh.  Anyone
got an alternative method of getting "table continued" in RTF?

Kind Regards,
--Quentin


On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:41:32 -0700, Jack Hamilton
<JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM> wrote:

>I wouldn't be surprised.  RTF doesn't know how long the pages will be
>when you print them; how could it know when to write footers?
>
>
>
>--
>>>> "Quentin McMullen" <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU> 12/17/2003 1:55 PM
>>>>
>Hi All,
>
>Does compute _after_ not work too well with RTF, or am I missing
>something
>obvious?
>
<snip>