Date:         Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:02:49 -0800
Reply-To:     cassell.david@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "David L. Cassell" <cassell.david@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: rtf proc report compute _after_
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Quentin McMullen <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU> sadly replied:
> Thanks Jack, I guess that makes sense. After posting this question, I
did
> stumble across your review of this year's sasware ballot, and I take
it
> that its mention there:
>
> >  PROC REPORT
> >  68 provide the ability to determine the end of a physical page in
> >  order to place LINE statements in COMPUTE AFTER _PAGE_ blocks for
all
> >  ODS destinations except OUTPUT
>
> means that even if it *could* happen, it aint happened yet.  Sigh.
Anyone
> got an alternative method of getting "table continued" in RTF?

As far as I know, the only way to get RTF to recognize that the table
*needs* to be continued is to read it into some word mangler^Wprocessor
like MS Word or WordPerfect and get the word processor to do the
pagination.
At that point, you are looking at a Word (or WordPerfect) macro to do
the
work you're seeking.

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful,
David
--
David Cassell, CSC
Cassell.David@epa.gov
Senior computing specialist
mathematical statistician