LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2004, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:01:14 +0000
Reply-To:     John Whittington <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Whittington <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: RE - Little Birdies fyi
Comments: To: Joe Whitehurst <joewhite@mindspring.com>, joewhite@mindspring.com
In-Reply-To:  <12113802.1074273085985.JavaMail.root@wamui06.slb.atl.earth
              link.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 12:11 16/01/04 -0500, Joe Whitehurst wrote:

>JW| "Firstly, it is not uncommon (and we have examples on SAS-L) for some >individuals to frequently use 'self referential words and phrases' very >much with their tongues in their cheeks, in some cases even to the point of >effectively being self-critical; to interpret that in the same sense as >'real' egocentricity would be incorrect." > >No doubt this is true. That's why we need 12-36 months of cumulative >verbal behavior.

In the case of some of those I have in mind, the 'tongue-in-cheek' (seemingly) egocentric behaviour is a perpetual feature of their behaviour, so you'd probably get the same (misleading/incorrect) answer whether you evaluated them over 1 month or 100 months.

>JW| "Secondly, as others have said/implied, egocentricity (in the sense your >index is assessing it) does not necessarily imply anything about the value >of the individual's contribution to discussions. .... " > >No doubt this is true as well.

I'm sure it is - but I fear many people might be misled by an 'egocentric' label into not realising this.

>No doubt you will get to see the egocentric index scores for the top 100.

I will? When and where? The 'top 100' of what?

>JW| "As for me, I judge people by the merit of what they >say/write/contribute, >regardless of how 'egocentricly' they do it." > >I do both. I evaluate the merits, and I evaluate how they do it.

Well, yes, I'm sure we all do to some extent; I suppose I worded that badly. What I really meant is that I'm very careful not to let my view of the merit/value of what people say be biased by considerations of the way they say it. I know a good few overbearingly arrogant and egocentric people whose opinions and advice I nevertheless regard extremely highly.

Kind Regards

John

---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: John.W@mediscience.co.uk Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com ----------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page