LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2004, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:36:32 -0500
Reply-To:   ben.powell@CLA.CO.UK
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   ben.powell@CLA.CO.UK
Subject:   Re: R vs. SAS (was Replacement for SAS (SPSS vs. SAS, redux))

Sounds like R is the SAS equivalent of Linux .. who are incidentally in all sorts of a copy left/right mess at the moment.

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:39:37 -0500, Peter Flom <flom@NDRI.ORG> wrote:

>I use both SAS and R; I"ve used SAS for 10 or 15 years, R for about 6 >months - 1 year. > >Each has strengths and weaknesses; I'd not like to give up either. > >Strengths of SAS (esp. compared to R) > >Tech support - I have SAS tech support's phone number and our license >number memorized. They're great. > >SAS-L - There's also an R-help list, and it's also great, but the mood >is different; r-help is less welcoming to newbie questions, silly >questions, badly worded questions, not directly on topic questions, and >so on. > >Dealing with large data sets - I don't do this much, but SAS is clearly >faster for large data sets, on which R sometimes bogs down completely. > >Dealing with 'unusual' data - SAS clearly shines in terms of ability to >input almost anything. R is more limited in this regard, and harder to >work with. > > > >Strengths of R > >It's free > >It's extendable - You can write programs as complex as you wish, and >many people have contributed many programs to R. > >It's open source - You can see the actual code that it uses; if you >like, you can modify the code. > >Graphics - R produces amazing graphics, of (almost) any type. Even >with SAS GRAPH, I don't think SAS can match it. Without SAS GRAPH, >well...... Also, from the little I've seen, SAS GRAPH is harder to use >than R graphics to produce equal-quality stuff. > > >Cutting edge statistics - Many are developed in R (or in its commercial >cousin - S Plus). It takes a while for them to make it into SAS. > > > > >Just MHO > > >Peter > >>>> bogdan romocea <br44092@GAWAB.COM> 2/5/2004 9:29:29 AM >>> >Michael, > >I think there is a software package around which is a worthy >replacement for SAS. The bean counters should be very happy to >find out that it can be obtained for free - it's Free Software >(released under the terms of the Free Software Foundation's GNU >General Public License in source code form). Naturally, I'm not >talking about SPSS. > >The possible replacement for SAS is R, http://www.r-project.org/ >There are some very notable differences between SAS and R. One >is a proprietary, very expensive, mature, well-supported >software with lots of features and a big user community. The >other is fairly young and not that well supported, but anyone >can improve it (want to fix a bug or add a new feature? - you >can do it yourself, the source code is available). And of >course, you can get it for $0. > >Depending on your situation you may find that a transition from >SAS to R is something of interest to you now. Here are a couple >of excerpts from R's web site: > >R is an integrated suite of software facilities for data >manipulation, calculation and graphical display. It includes >* an effective data handling and storage facility, >* a suite of operators for calculations on arrays, in particular >matrices, >* a large, coherent, integrated collection of intermediate tools >for data analysis, >* graphical facilities for data analysis and display either >on-screen or on hardcopy, and >* a well-developed, simple and effective programming language >which includes conditionals, loops, user-defined recursive >functions and input and output facilities. > >R provides a wide variety of statistical (linear and nonlinear >modelling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, >classification, clustering, ...) and graphical techniques, and >is highly extensible. The S language is often the vehicle of >choice for research in statistical methodology, and R provides >an Open Source route to participation in that activity. > >HTH, >b. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Talbot Michael Katz [mailto:topkatz@MSN.COM] >Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:26 PM >To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU >Subject: SPSS vs. SAS, redux > > >Hey, gang! > >I thought now would be as good a time as any to dust off the >periodic SPSS >comparison thread, and see what the current thinking is among my >fellow SAS >users. (By the way, does SPSS have a list-serve comparable to >SAS-L? Or >user groups like SUGI?) Naturally, I have an ulterior motive -- >the bean >counters have once again recoiled in horror at the annual $A$ >$hakedown, >and they want to do some comparison shopping. I've been >appointed the SAS >defense counsel. The problem is, I know less than nothing about >my >opponent. I haven't used SPSS in more than ten years; I've >forgotten the >little that I knew, and I have no experience with the wealth of >additions >they've made in the past decade. Here's the marketing pitch >they hit me >with... >________________________________ >15 Mbytes Free Web-based and POP3 >Sign up now: http://www.gawab.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page