LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2004)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 14 May 2004 12:43:36 +0800
Reply-To:     Peggo Lam <peggo.lam@polyu.edu.hk>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Peggo Lam <peggo.lam@polyu.edu.hk>
Subject:      Re: Problems with intra-class correlation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Michael,

A low (or even negative) ICC value may also due to lack of variability among the subjects. Personally I will compute the 95% limits of agreement which represents how far a difference between any two repeated measurements from a single subject can be.

If you need further reference, the paper by White and van den Broek (2004) contrasted a number of methods for assessing reliability.

White, S.A., and van den Broek, N.R. (2004). Methods for assessing reliability and validity for a measurement tool: a case study and critique using the WHO haemoglobin colour scale. Stat Med, 23, 1603-19.

Cheers,

Peggo.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page