LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2004)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 14 May 2004 17:05:12 -0400
Reply-To:     Colin_Valdiserri@marketstrategies.com
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Colin Valdiserri <Colin_Valdiserri@marketstrategies.com>
Subject:      PREFMAP  vs. ALSCAL / INDSCAL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Does anyone have any feelings, experiences, opinions on the use of mapping software that uses PREFMAP as compared to SPSS' ALSCAL? I am a die hard users of ALSCAL, INDSCAL, Etc. Going back to the literature such as Myers' book on Segmentation and Positioning (1996), it seems to me that PREFMAP's or vector maps are not as easy for clients to interpret, don't capture actual "perceptual spce" and cannot be compared as you can with weighted or individual differences scaling in SPSS. It also seems that a "point" map is more robust in its possible uses as cpmpared to a vector map.

I am new to a firm who uses software with PREFMAP and is relatively unaware of ALSCAL, INDSCAL and Multidimensional Unfolding for Preference Scaling. Is this PREFMAP software as robust as SPSS's?

Thoughts, feelings, opinions, I am welcoming them all!

Colin M. Valdiserri, M.A. Marketing Sciences Analyst Market Strategies, Inc. colin_valdiserri@marketstrategies.com Phone: (734) 779-6826


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page