LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2004)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:10:48 +0200
Reply-To:   Qinghai Huang <huangqh@psychology.su.se>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Qinghai Huang <huangqh@psychology.su.se>
Subject:   Re: dummy variable coding in regression
In-Reply-To:   <1089317527.40edaa97e6c09@webmail.sussex.ac.uk>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

David,

Thank you for your help.

>If you have created a dummy for each category then you can easily do >different regressions with a different dummy left out each time, giving >a different reference category. However, these signficance tests are >not all independent of each other, so you should only test the >comparisons that you are really interested in, and not compare >everything with everything just in case there is a difference >somewhere; that needs the proper use of post-hoc comparison methods.

Now I realize that regression and ANOVA has the same issue in the post-hoc comparison. So hypotheses are very important. I will pay attention to this!

Qinghai


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page