LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2004)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:51:31 +0100
Reply-To:     Constantina Stamou <c_stamou@yahoo.co.uk>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Constantina Stamou <c_stamou@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject:      pooled data method based on Factor Analysis
In-Reply-To:  <20040926121434.BTOW22385.out006.verizon.net@frankjgallo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hello all,

I have nine independent variables measuring attitude which I have reduced to two factors, 'positive' and 'negative'. First of all, one of the 'positive' variables crept in the negative factor, however it has a high negative loading. also common sense says it should not be there because it distorts the interpretability of the factor. Could it be due to the fact that my sample is quite small, 34 cases?

Also, attitude was measured using 5-point Likert-type scales. I intend to perform regression analysis. Should I use the derived factors or can I add the values of the 'positive' let's say factor, and use that in regression? Is this what is known as pooled data method? As an idea, it probably does not make sense, however I came across a paper, and by the way it was written, that was the impression I was given. I am probably wrong somewhere in my thinking, so is it possible for someone to help me?

Thank you in advance.

Tina

___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page