LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2004, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:23:21 -0800
Reply-To:     cassell.david@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "David L. Cassell" <cassell.david@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: Logistic Regression Question
In-Reply-To:  <A7D4140CA0A3D24CA55F8A4495F1B2510606A209@argon.dcri.duke.edu>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

"DePuy, Venita" <depuy001@DCRI.DUKE.EDU> sagely replied: > My understanding is that Catmod is a) painful, b) geared toward multinomial > logit regression, and c) can be accomplished in Genmod.

More-or-less true.

[A] CATMOD is older, and not as flexible. It's so old that my wife used it in her doctoral dissertation. (Why does that sound vaguely as if Rodney Dangerfield should be saying it, followed by a rimshot? :-)

[B] It's still fairly useful. You can do logits, generalized logits, cumulative logits, means, proportions, blah blah blah. BUT you can't really control the estimation method. You get MLE with logits and generalized logits, and weighted least squares (but NOT the sample weights as in this thread!) elsewhere. GENMOD and other, newer, procs are more flexible.

[C] Pretty much.

> Why don't you try proc surveyreg? Although I don't know that it will do > logistic.

It won't. But you're dead on. The survey design effects have to be accounted for. PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC (SAS 9.1) is made for this problem.

> At any rate, you can do logistic regression in Genmod with a logit link, and > I believe it has more options than Proc Logistic does.

But doing all the mucking around to adjust for survey design effects in the variance-covariance matrix is a headache, and that still doesn't take into account all the other problems implicit in trying to wedge the survey design paradigm into a model-based paradigm. Like the lack of proper domain analysis.

> Don't do survey stuff myself, so perhaps someone else can speak to that end > of things.

Like anyone around here can get me to shut up. :-)

David -- David Cassell, CSC Cassell.David@epa.gov Senior computing specialist mathematical statistician


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page